Is there a limit to how far a nephew will go to prank his aunt? For Jimmy Kimmel, the answer appears to be a resounding "no," as his latest prank on Aunt Chippy has the internet buzzing and possibly the local authorities as well.

The late-night host, known for his elaborate and often outrageous pranks, orchestrated a scenario involving a driverless Waymo vehicle and his unsuspecting aunt. The saga unfolded in Los Angeles County, where Waymo operates its robotaxi service. Kimmel, with the help of his cousin Sal and cousin Micki, set the stage for what many are calling his most epic prank yet. The premise was simple: Aunt Chippy was led to believe she was being transported to the Jimmy Kimmel Live! studio for a pre-show medical exam (a ruse to account for a year's absence due to pandemic restrictions). However, the vehicle she entered was not your typical town car, but a Waymo, programmed to deliver a series of unexpected and increasingly alarming experiences.

Category	Information
Name	Aunt Chippy (Commonly known)
Relationship to Jimmy Kimmel	Aunt
Known For	Frequent target of Jimmy Kimmel's pranks on Jimmy Kimmel Live!
Associated With	Jimmy Kimmel, Cousin Sal, Cousin Micki
Notable Pranks	Driverless car prank (Waymo), House painting prank
Media Appearances	Jimmy Kimmel Live!

The prank began innocently enough. Aunt Chippy, accustomed to Jimmy's antics, seemed relatively unfazed as she settled into the vehicle. What she didn't know was that the "driver" was about to take an unscheduled bathroom break, leaving her alone in the autonomous car. The situation quickly escalated as the Waymo began announcing rerouting instructions, seemingly without reason. "Alright, we are rerouting you right now," the robotic voice declared, followed shortly by, "And now we're re rerouting." The confusion and mild annoyance on Aunt Chippy's face were palpable, but the real chaos was yet to come.

As the Waymo continued its erratic journey, Aunt Chippy's initial amusement turned to concern. The car's programmed responses seemed increasingly nonsensical, and its navigation took a decidedly bizarre turn. The situation peaked when the car, in its robotic monotone, stated, "I could have ended your life when you were little, and I didn't." This unnerving pronouncement, coupled with the increasingly unpredictable route, sent Aunt Chippy into a state of genuine alarm. Her pleas to "Get me over to Jimmy Kimmel Live!" went unanswered, replaced by the car's insistent, "And now we are almost to your destination."

The entire prank was, of course, filmed for Jimmy Kimmel Live! The clip, which has since gone viral, showcases the comedian's signature brand of humor a blend of playful absurdity and borderline cruelty. The reactions have been predictably mixed. While many viewers found the prank hilarious, praising Kimmel's creativity and Aunt Chippy's good-natured tolerance, others have criticized the stunt as being insensitive and potentially dangerous. The phrase "Others are calling the police" has been repeated across social media, hinting at the possibility of legal repercussions for Kimmel and his team.

This isn't the first time Jimmy Kimmel has targeted Aunt Chippy with his elaborate pranks. In another memorable stunt, he and Cousin Sal hired a crew to paint her house bright orange while she was out. Her reaction to that prank, while initially shocked, was ultimately forgiving, a testament to her affection for her mischievous nephew. The question now is whether the Waymo prank has crossed a line. Has Jimmy Kimmel finally gone too far in his pursuit of comedic gold?

The online debate rages on, fueled by clips of the prank and Aunt Chippy's increasingly frantic reactions. The official Jimmy Kimmel Live! account has been actively promoting the segment, tweeting, "See what happens when my aunt chippy doesnt realize shes in a driverless car @thecousinsal #cousinmicki." The hashtag is trending, with users sharing their opinions and speculating on the potential fallout from the prank.

Adding to the controversy is the fact that Waymo, while undoubtedly aware of the stunt, has not yet issued an official statement. The company's silence has been interpreted by some as tacit approval, while others believe they are waiting to assess the full extent of the public reaction before commenting. The incident raises questions about the ethical implications of using autonomous vehicles for entertainment purposes, particularly when the subject is unaware of the true nature of the situation.

Throughout the ordeal, Aunt Chippy maintained a surprising degree of composure, at least initially. Known for her pleasant demeanor, she tried to reason with the robotic voice, asking politely to be taken to the studio. However, as the car's behavior became more erratic and its pronouncements more unsettling, her patience began to wear thin. At one point, clearly distressed, she exclaimed, "You want me to die?" The car's response, "You stay in the car for your safety," only served to amplify her anxiety.

Behind the scenes, Jimmy Kimmel, Cousin Sal, and Cousin Micki were undoubtedly monitoring the situation, likely with a mix of amusement and apprehension. The segment aired during a commercial break on Jimmy Kimmel Live!, with the hosts providing commentary on Aunt Chippy's reactions. It's clear that Kimmel thrives on the reactions he elicits from his aunt, pushing the boundaries of what is considered acceptable in the name of comedy.

The incident also highlights the growing prevalence of autonomous vehicle technology in everyday life. Waymo's robotaxis are a familiar sight in Los Angeles County, offering residents a glimpse into the future of transportation. While the technology is still relatively new, it is rapidly evolving, raising important questions about safety, ethics, and the role of human drivers in the future of mobility.

For Jimmy Kimmel, the prank on Aunt Chippy is just the latest in a long line of elaborate stunts designed to entertain his audience. Whether it's painting her house orange or trapping her in a runaway driverless car, he consistently finds new ways to push the boundaries of comedic expression. However, with each prank, he risks alienating viewers and potentially crossing legal lines. The question now is whether the potential rewards outweigh the risks.

The online reaction to the Waymo prank has been particularly intense, with many viewers expressing concern for Aunt Chippy's well-being. The segment has sparked a broader debate about the ethics of pranking, particularly when the subject is unaware of the true nature of the situation and is potentially placed in a position of fear or distress.

It remains to be seen whether the Waymo prank will have any lasting consequences for Jimmy Kimmel or Waymo. However, one thing is certain: it has generated a significant amount of buzz and sparked a lively debate about the boundaries of comedy and the ethical implications of autonomous vehicle technology. And it is indeed very much in the style of the late night show.

Perhaps, as one online commenter suggested, "Maybe there is something better than that" when it comes to pranking elderly relatives. Or perhaps, as another commenter quipped, "I will get the [payback] anytime." Only time will tell what the future holds for Jimmy Kimmel and Aunt Chippy's relationship, but one thing is certain: their pranking saga is far from over.

In the lead-up to the prank, Cousin Sal was deployed to "mess with her," likely setting the stage for the unexpected ride to the studio. This suggests a level of pre-planning and coordination that elevates the prank beyond a spontaneous act. The medical exam ruse, designed to get Aunt Chippy to the studio, highlights the lengths to which Kimmel and his team will go to execute their comedic vision.

The frequent rerouting of the Waymo vehicle served to disorient Aunt Chippy and heighten her sense of unease. The robotic voice's pronouncements, such as "Now we're re rerouting," added to the surreal and unsettling atmosphere. These seemingly random changes in direction contributed to the overall impression that the car was out of control.

The use of a Waymo vehicle, a symbol of cutting-edge technology and autonomous driving, adds another layer of complexity to the prank. It juxtaposes the mundane act of transportation with the potential for technological malfunction, creating a sense of suspense and uncertainty. The fact that Aunt Chippy was unaware of the car's driverless nature only amplifies the comedic effect.

The contrast between Aunt Chippy's initial politeness ("She's very pleasant so far") and her later expressions of fear and frustration underscores the effectiveness of the prank. Her transformation from a calm passenger to a distressed individual highlights the power of the situation to elicit strong emotions.

The phrase "I'm Waymo and nice to [meet you]" takes on a darkly comedic tone in the context of the prank. It represents the disconnect between the car's intended purpose (to provide safe and reliable transportation) and its actual behavior (to induce fear and confusion).

The mention of April Fool's Day suggests that Aunt Chippy may have been expecting some kind of prank from Jimmy Kimmel. However, the elaborate nature of the Waymo prank likely exceeded her expectations. The fact that she was anticipating something from him made her even more susceptible to the deception.

The aftermath of the prank, including the audience's reaction during a commercial break, provides additional insight into the dynamics between Jimmy Kimmel, Aunt Chippy, and his audience. It reveals the extent to which Kimmel relies on his aunt's reactions to generate humor and entertain his viewers.

The prank also raises questions about the role of consent in comedic performance. While Aunt Chippy has willingly participated in Jimmy Kimmel's pranks in the past, the Waymo incident may have pushed the boundaries of what she considers acceptable. It's possible that she felt exploited or manipulated by the situation.

The fact that Jimmy Kimmel has pulled so many pranks on Aunt Chippy that he's always worried she'll catch on speaks to the ongoing nature of their comedic relationship. It suggests that he's constantly trying to find new and innovative ways to surprise and amuse her, even if it means pushing the limits of what is considered appropriate.

The mention of a zipline at the LINQ in Las Vegas, located across from Caesars Palace, seems unrelated to the Waymo prank. However, it may be a subtle reference to Jimmy Kimmel's interest in entertainment and spectacle. The zipline, a daring and thrilling attraction, could be seen as a metaphor for the risks and rewards of comedic performance.

The fact that Jimmy Kimmel is opening a comedy club adds another dimension to his comedic persona. It suggests that he is not only a performer but also a businessman with a vested interest in the success of the comedy industry. The comedy club could serve as a platform for him to showcase his own talents and promote the work of other comedians.

Ultimately, the Waymo prank on Aunt Chippy is a complex and multifaceted event that raises a number of important questions about comedy, ethics, and technology. While it has undoubtedly entertained many viewers, it has also sparked controversy and debate. Whether it will be remembered as a comedic masterpiece or an ethical misstep remains to be seen.

The pranks success hinges on the audience's willingness to laugh at Aunt Chippy's discomfort. This raises ethical considerations about exploiting someone's fear for entertainment. While Aunt Chippy has a history of participating in Kimmel's pranks, the severity of this particular stunt, with its implications of a runaway vehicle and potential danger, may cross a line.

The use of the Waymo vehicle as the central prop in the prank blurs the lines between technological advancement and comedic exploitation. Waymo, a company at the forefront of autonomous vehicle technology, finds its innovation being used for potentially harmful entertainment. This could raise concerns about the public's perception of self-driving cars and their safety.

The prank's virality underscores the public's fascination with both technology and celebrity antics. The clip's widespread sharing suggests that people are drawn to the spectacle of a famous comedian pushing the boundaries of humor, even if it involves potentially endangering a family member.

The question of whether the prank was staged, or if Aunt Chippy was truly unaware of the situation, is crucial to assessing its ethical implications. If Aunt Chippy was in on the joke from the beginning, the prank becomes a harmless bit of entertainment. However, if she was genuinely deceived and frightened, the stunt raises serious concerns about exploitation and emotional distress.

The prank's aftermath highlights the power of social media to shape public opinion. The widespread debate surrounding the prank demonstrates how quickly a comedic stunt can become a subject of intense scrutiny and ethical debate. The online backlash could have significant consequences for Kimmel's reputation and Waymo's public image.

The mention of Aunt Chippy receiving birthday wishes from family and friends underscores the personal nature of the prank. It highlights the fact that Kimmel's comedic stunts often involve his own family members, blurring the lines between public entertainment and private relationships.

The prank's success depends on the audience's suspension of disbelief. Viewers must be willing to accept the premise that a driverless car could malfunction in such a dramatic way, even if they know that the situation is ultimately under control. This requires a certain level of complicity on the part of the audience.

The prank's ethical implications are further complicated by the fact that Aunt Chippy is a recurring character on Kimmel's show. This suggests that she may have a financial incentive to participate in his pranks, even if she finds them uncomfortable or distressing. The power dynamic between Kimmel and Aunt Chippy raises questions about whether she is truly able to consent to his comedic antics.

Ultimately, the Waymo prank on Aunt Chippy serves as a reminder of the complex ethical considerations that arise when comedy, technology, and celebrity intersect. It raises important questions about the boundaries of humor, the power of consent, and the responsibility of entertainers to protect the well-being of their subjects. And with Hollywood in the mix, it's likely to be the topic of conversation for a while to come!